2016-11-13 01:53:28 +00:00
|
|
|
From 4a1b921c63087b9822ede699690035bdd67d27a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
|
|
|
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:18:36 +0100
|
2016-12-09 02:42:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] ath9k: fix buffer overrun for ar9287
|
2016-11-13 01:53:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Code that was added back in 2.6.38 has an obvious overflow
|
|
|
|
|
when accessing a static array, and at the time it was added
|
|
|
|
|
only a code comment was put in front of it as a reminder
|
|
|
|
|
to have it reviewed properly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This has not happened, but gcc-6 now points to the specific
|
|
|
|
|
overflow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c: In function 'ath9k_hw_get_gain_boundaries_pdadcs':
|
|
|
|
|
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c:483:44: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
|
|
|
|
|
maxPwrT4[i] = data_9287[idxL].pwrPdg[i][4];
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It turns out that the correct array length exists in the local
|
|
|
|
|
'intercepts' variable of this function, so we can just use that
|
|
|
|
|
instead of hardcoding '4', so this patch changes all three
|
|
|
|
|
instances to use that variable. The other two instances were
|
|
|
|
|
already correct, but it's more consistent this way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes: 940cd2c12ebf ("ath9k_hw: merge the ar9287 version of ath9k_hw_get_gain_boundaries_pdadcs")
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c | 7 +++----
|
|
|
|
|
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
|
|
|
|
|
index 971d770..2ac0548 100644
|
|
|
|
|
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
|
|
|
|
|
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -408,10 +408,9 @@ void ath9k_hw_get_gain_boundaries_pdadcs(struct ath_hw *ah,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (match) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (AR_SREV_9287(ah)) {
|
|
|
|
|
- /* FIXME: array overrun? */
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < numXpdGains; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
minPwrT4[i] = data_9287[idxL].pwrPdg[i][0];
|
|
|
|
|
- maxPwrT4[i] = data_9287[idxL].pwrPdg[i][4];
|
|
|
|
|
+ maxPwrT4[i] = data_9287[idxL].pwrPdg[i][intercepts - 1];
|
|
|
|
|
ath9k_hw_fill_vpd_table(minPwrT4[i], maxPwrT4[i],
|
|
|
|
|
data_9287[idxL].pwrPdg[i],
|
|
|
|
|
data_9287[idxL].vpdPdg[i],
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -421,7 +420,7 @@ void ath9k_hw_get_gain_boundaries_pdadcs(struct ath_hw *ah,
|
|
|
|
|
} else if (eeprom_4k) {
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < numXpdGains; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
minPwrT4[i] = data_4k[idxL].pwrPdg[i][0];
|
|
|
|
|
- maxPwrT4[i] = data_4k[idxL].pwrPdg[i][4];
|
|
|
|
|
+ maxPwrT4[i] = data_4k[idxL].pwrPdg[i][intercepts - 1];
|
|
|
|
|
ath9k_hw_fill_vpd_table(minPwrT4[i], maxPwrT4[i],
|
|
|
|
|
data_4k[idxL].pwrPdg[i],
|
|
|
|
|
data_4k[idxL].vpdPdg[i],
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -431,7 +430,7 @@ void ath9k_hw_get_gain_boundaries_pdadcs(struct ath_hw *ah,
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < numXpdGains; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
minPwrT4[i] = data_def[idxL].pwrPdg[i][0];
|
|
|
|
|
- maxPwrT4[i] = data_def[idxL].pwrPdg[i][4];
|
|
|
|
|
+ maxPwrT4[i] = data_def[idxL].pwrPdg[i][intercepts - 1];
|
|
|
|
|
ath9k_hw_fill_vpd_table(minPwrT4[i], maxPwrT4[i],
|
|
|
|
|
data_def[idxL].pwrPdg[i],
|
|
|
|
|
data_def[idxL].vpdPdg[i],
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
2.10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
