PKGBUILDs/community/dietlibc/0027-fix-arm-mmap.diff
2013-06-08 03:37:47 +00:00

71 lines
1.8 KiB
Diff

From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:33:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] fix mmap syscall on ARM
several issues found while debugging on the Debian armhf porterbox
on #debian-arm with pbrook (Paul Brook) and lindi- (Timo Juhani Lindfors)
- the comment only applies to the non-EABI part of the function
- "This is ARM code. But you've not maked mmap as a function symbol."
=> use the arm-features.h macros
Index: pkg-dietlibc/arm/mmap.S
===================================================================
--- pkg-dietlibc.orig/arm/mmap.S 2012-03-25 15:07:28.000000000 +0000
+++ pkg-dietlibc/arm/mmap.S 2012-03-25 15:14:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,22 +1,13 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include "syscalls.h"
+#include "dietfeatures.h"
+#include "arm-features.h"
.text
-@
-@ mmap takes 6 parameters - ie more than can be passed in registers via the
-@ regular syscall interface. Instead, parameters are passed on the stack.
-@
-@ On entry, the compiler will have already placed the fifth and sixth
-@ parameters on the stack - all we need do here is push the first four and
-@ call the syscall.
-@
-
-.global mmap
+FUNC_START mmap
#ifdef __ARM_EABI__
-
-mmap:
str r5, [sp, #-4]!
ldr r5, [sp, #8]
str r4, [sp, #-4]!
@@ -28,11 +19,19 @@
ldr r4, [sp], #4
ldr r5, [sp], #4
cmn r0, #4096
- mov pc, lr @ return
+ RET
+
+#else
+
+@
+@ mmap takes 6 parameters - ie more than can be passed in registers via the
+@ regular syscall interface. Instead, parameters are passed on the stack.
+@
+@ On entry, the compiler will have already placed the fifth and sixth
+@ parameters on the stack - all we need do here is push the first four and
+@ call the syscall.
+@
-#else
-
-mmap:
stmdb sp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3}
mov r0, sp
swi __NR_mmap
@@ -40,3 +39,5 @@
b __unified_syscall
#endif
+
+FUNC_END mmap