mirror of
https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics.git
synced 2024-11-21 14:44:00 +00:00
docs/CaseStudies.md: actualize Wix numbers
This commit is contained in:
parent
b4356550fd
commit
5d5076c4a2
1 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -73,13 +73,14 @@ See [Monitoring K8S with VictoriaMetrics](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d
|
|||
|
||||
Numbers:
|
||||
|
||||
* The number of active time series per VictoriaMetrics instance is 20M.
|
||||
* The number of active time series per VictoriaMetrics instance is 40M.
|
||||
* The total number of time series per VictoriaMetrics instance is 400M+.
|
||||
* Ingestion rate per VictoriaMetrics instance is 800K data points per second.
|
||||
* Ingestion rate per VictoriaMetrics instance is 1M data points per second.
|
||||
* The total number of datapoints per VictoriaMetrics instance is 8 trillions.
|
||||
* The average time series churn rate is ~3M per day.
|
||||
* The average query rate is ~1K per minute (mostly alert queries).
|
||||
* Query duration: median is ~70ms, 99th percentile is ~2sec.
|
||||
* Retention: 6 months.
|
||||
* The average query rate is ~100 per second (mostly alert queries).
|
||||
* Query duration: median is ~70ms, 99th percentile is ~1.5sec.
|
||||
* Retention: 3 months.
|
||||
|
||||
> Alternatives that we’ve played with before choosing VictoriaMetrics are: federated Prometheus, Cortex, IronDB and Thanos.
|
||||
> Points that were critical to us when we were choosing a central tsdb, in order of importance:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue