mirror of
https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics.git
synced 2024-11-21 14:44:00 +00:00
docs/VictoriaLogs/FAQ.md: clarify answers a bit
This commit is contained in:
parent
ead3250b80
commit
61ae077e43
1 changed files with 26 additions and 25 deletions
|
@ -22,16 +22,17 @@ They aren't optimized specifically for logs. This results in the following issue
|
||||||
- High RAM usage
|
- High RAM usage
|
||||||
- High disk space usage
|
- High disk space usage
|
||||||
- Non-trivial index setup
|
- Non-trivial index setup
|
||||||
- Inability to select more than 10K matching log lines in a single query
|
- Inability to select more than 10K matching log lines in a single query with default configs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs is optimized specifically for logs. So it provides the following features useful for logs, which are missing in Elasticsearch:
|
VictoriaLogs is optimized specifically for logs. So it provides the following features useful for logs, which are missing in Elasticsearch:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Easy to setup and operate. There is no need in tuning configuration for optimal performance or in creating any indexes for various log types.
|
- Easy to setup and operate. There is no need in tuning configuration for optimal performance or in creating any indexes for various log types.
|
||||||
Just run VictoriaLogs on the most suitable hardware - and it automatically provides the best performance.
|
Just run VictoriaLogs on the most suitable hardware, ingest logs into it via [supported data ingestion protocols](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/data-ingestion/)
|
||||||
|
and get the best available performance out of the box.
|
||||||
- Up to 30x less RAM usage than Elasticsearch for the same workload.
|
- Up to 30x less RAM usage than Elasticsearch for the same workload.
|
||||||
- Up to 15x less disk space usage than Elasticsearch for the same amounts of stored logs.
|
- Up to 15x less disk space usage than Elasticsearch for the same amounts of stored logs.
|
||||||
- Ability to work with hundreds of terabytes of logs on a single node.
|
- Ability to work efficiently with hundreds of terabytes of logs on a single node.
|
||||||
- Very easy to use query language optimized for typical log analysis tasks - [LogsQL](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/).
|
- Easy to use query language optimized for typical log analysis tasks - [LogsQL](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/).
|
||||||
- Fast full-text search over all the [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model) out of the box.
|
- Fast full-text search over all the [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model) out of the box.
|
||||||
- Good integration with traditional command-line tools for log analysis. See [these docs](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/querying/#command-line).
|
- Good integration with traditional command-line tools for log analysis. See [these docs](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/querying/#command-line).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -43,23 +44,25 @@ Both systems support [log stream](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs and Grafana Loki have the following differences:
|
VictoriaLogs and Grafana Loki have the following differences:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Grafana Loki doesn't support high-cardinality log fields (aka labels) such as `user_id`, `trace_id` or `ip`.
|
- VictoriaLogs is much easier to setup and operate than Grafana Loki. There is no need in non-trivial tuning -
|
||||||
It starts consuming huge amounts of RAM and working very slow when logs with high-cardinality fields are ingested into it.
|
it works great with default configuration.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- VictoriaLogs performs typical full-text search queries up to 1000x faster than Grafana Loki.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Grafana Loki doesn't support log fields with many unique values (aka high cardinality labels) such as `user_id`, `trace_id` or `ip`.
|
||||||
|
It consumes huge amounts of RAM and slows down significantly when logs with high-cardinality fields are ingested into it.
|
||||||
See [these docs](https://grafana.com/docs/loki/latest/best-practices/) for details.
|
See [these docs](https://grafana.com/docs/loki/latest/best-practices/) for details.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs supports high-cardinality [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model).
|
VictoriaLogs supports high-cardinality [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model)
|
||||||
It automatically indexes all the ingested log fields and allows performing fast full-text search over any field.
|
out of the box without any additional configuration. It automatically indexes all the ingested log fields,
|
||||||
|
so fast full-text search over any log field works without issues.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Grafana Loki provides very inconvenient query language - [LogQL](https://grafana.com/docs/loki/latest/logql/).
|
- Grafana Loki provides very inconvenient query language - [LogQL](https://grafana.com/docs/loki/latest/logql/).
|
||||||
This query language is hard to use for typical log analysis tasks.
|
This query language is hard to use for typical log analysis tasks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs provides easy to use query language for typical log analysis tasks - [LogsQL](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/).
|
VictoriaLogs provides easy to use query language for typical log analysis tasks - [LogsQL](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- VictoriaLogs performs typical full-text queries up to 1000x faster than Grafana Loki.
|
- VictoriaLogs usually needs less RAM and storage space than Grafana Loki for the same amounts of logs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- VictoriaLogs needs less storage space than Grafana Loki for the same amounts of logs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- VictoriaLogs is much easier to setup and operate than Grafana Loki.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## What is the difference between VictoriaLogs and ClickHouse?
|
## What is the difference between VictoriaLogs and ClickHouse?
|
||||||
|
@ -67,14 +70,12 @@ VictoriaLogs and Grafana Loki have the following differences:
|
||||||
ClickHouse is an extremely fast and efficient analytical database. It can be used for logs storage, analysis and processing.
|
ClickHouse is an extremely fast and efficient analytical database. It can be used for logs storage, analysis and processing.
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs is designed solely for logs. VictoriaLogs uses [similar design ideas as ClickHouse](#how-does-victorialogs-work) for achieving high performance.
|
VictoriaLogs is designed solely for logs. VictoriaLogs uses [similar design ideas as ClickHouse](#how-does-victorialogs-work) for achieving high performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- ClickHouse is good for logs if you know the set of [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model) beforehand.
|
- ClickHouse is good for logs if you know the set of [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model)
|
||||||
Then you can create a table with a column per each log field and achieve the maximum possible query performance.
|
and the expected query types beforehand. Then you can create a table with a column per each log field, and use the most optimal settings for the table -
|
||||||
|
sort order, partitioning and indexing - for achieving the maximum possible storage efficiency and query performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the set of log fields isn't known beforehand, or if it can change at any time, then ClickHouse can still be used,
|
If the expected log fields or the expected query types aren't known beforehand, or if they may change over any time,
|
||||||
but its' efficiency may suffer significantly depending on how you design the database schema for log storage.
|
then ClickHouse can still be used, but its' efficiency may suffer significantly depending on how you design the database schema for log storage.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ClickHouse efficiency highly depends on the used database schema. It must be optimized for the particular workload
|
|
||||||
for achieving high efficiency and query performance.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs works optimally with any log types out of the box - structured, unstructured and mixed.
|
VictoriaLogs works optimally with any log types out of the box - structured, unstructured and mixed.
|
||||||
It works optimally with any sets of [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model),
|
It works optimally with any sets of [log fields](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model),
|
||||||
|
@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ VictoriaLogs is designed solely for logs. VictoriaLogs uses [similar design idea
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs provides easy to use query language with full-text search specifically optimized
|
VictoriaLogs provides easy to use query language with full-text search specifically optimized
|
||||||
for log analysis - [LogsQL](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/).
|
for log analysis - [LogsQL](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/).
|
||||||
LogsQL is usually much easier to use than SQL for typical log analysis tasks, while some
|
LogsQL is usually easier to use than SQL for typical log analysis tasks, while some
|
||||||
non-trivial analytics may require SQL power.
|
non-trivial analytics may require SQL power.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- VictoriaLogs accepts logs from popular log shippers out of the box - see [these docs](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/data-ingestion/).
|
- VictoriaLogs accepts logs from popular log shippers out of the box - see [these docs](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/data-ingestion/).
|
||||||
|
@ -97,8 +98,8 @@ VictoriaLogs is designed solely for logs. VictoriaLogs uses [similar design idea
|
||||||
## How does VictoriaLogs work?
|
## How does VictoriaLogs work?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VictoriaLogs accepts logs as [JSON entries](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model).
|
VictoriaLogs accepts logs as [JSON entries](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#data-model).
|
||||||
It then stores every field value into a distinct data block. E.g. values for the same field across multiple log entries
|
Then it stores log fields into a distinct data block. E.g. values for the same log field across multiple log entries
|
||||||
are stored in a single data block. This allow reading data blocks only for the needed fields during querying.
|
are stored in a single data block. This allows reading data blocks only for the needed fields during querying.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Data blocks are compressed before being saved to persistent storage. This allows saving disk space and improving query performance
|
Data blocks are compressed before being saved to persistent storage. This allows saving disk space and improving query performance
|
||||||
when it is limited by disk read IO bandwidth.
|
when it is limited by disk read IO bandwidth.
|
||||||
|
@ -117,9 +118,9 @@ On top of this, VictoriaLogs employs additional optimizations for achieving high
|
||||||
- It uses [bloom filters](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom_filter) for skipping blocks without the given
|
- It uses [bloom filters](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom_filter) for skipping blocks without the given
|
||||||
[word](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#word-filter) or [phrase](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#phrase-filter).
|
[word](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#word-filter) or [phrase](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#phrase-filter).
|
||||||
- It uses custom encoding and compression for fields with different data types.
|
- It uses custom encoding and compression for fields with different data types.
|
||||||
For example, it encodes IP addresses as 4-byte tuples. Custom fields' encoding reduces data size on disk and improves query performance.
|
For example, it encodes IP addresses int 4 bytes. Custom fields' encoding reduces data size on disk and improves query performance.
|
||||||
- It physically groups logs for the same [log stream](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#stream-fields)
|
- It physically groups logs for the same [log stream](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#stream-fields)
|
||||||
close to each other. This improves compression ratio, which helps reducing disk space usage. This also improves query performance
|
close to each other in the storage. This improves compression ratio, which helps reducing disk space usage. This also improves query performance
|
||||||
by skipping blocks for unneeded streams when [stream filter](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#stream-filter) is used.
|
by skipping blocks for unneeded streams when [stream filter](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#stream-filter) is used.
|
||||||
- It maintains sparse index for [log timestamps](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#time-field),
|
- It maintains sparse index for [log timestamps](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/keyconcepts/#time-field),
|
||||||
which allow improving query performance when [time filter](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#time-filter) is used.
|
which allow improving query performance when [time filter](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/logsql/#time-filter) is used.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue