There is a bug here where if you have a single bucket like:
foo{vmrange="4.084e+02...4.642e+02"} 2 123
The expected output is three le encoded buckets like:
foo{le="4.084e+02"} 0 123
foo{le="4.642e+02"} 2 123
foo{le="+Inf"} 2 123
This correctly encodes the start and end of the vmrange.
If however, the input contains the previous bucket, and that bucket is
empty then you only get the end le and +Inf out currently, i.e:
foo{vmrange="7.743e+05...8.799e+05"} 5 123
foo{vmrange="6.813e+05...7.743e+05"} 0 123
results in:
foo{le="8.799e+05"} 5 123
foo{le="+Inf"} 5 123
This causes issues when you go to compute a quantile because this means
that the assumed lower bound of the buckets is 0 and this we interpolate
between 0->end rather than the vmrange start->end as expected.
- Allocate and initialize seriesByWorkerID slice in a single go instead
of initializing every item in the list separately.
This should reduce CPU usage a bit.
- Properly set anti-false sharing padding at timeseriesWithPadding structure
- Document the change at docs/CHANGELOG.md
Updates https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/3966
* vmselect/promql: refactor `evalRollupNoIncrementalAggregate` to use lock-less approach for parallel workers computation
Locking there is causing issues when running on highly multi-core system as it introduces lock contention during results merge.
New implementation uses lock less approach to store results per workerID and merges final result in the end, this is expected to significantly reduce lock contention and CPU usage for systems with high number of cores.
Related: #3966
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
* vmselect/promql: add pooling for `timeseriesWithPadding` to reduce allocations
Related: #3966
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
* vmselect/promql: refactor `evalRollupFuncWithSubquery` to avoid using locks
Uses same approach as `evalRollupNoIncrementalAggregate` to remove locking between workers and reduce lock contention.
Related: #3966
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
This opens the possibility to remove tssLock from evalRollupFuncWithSubquery()
in the follow-up commit from @zekker6 in order to speed up the code
for systems with many CPU cores.
Updates https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/3966
Previously too short lookbehind window d for rate(m[d]) could be automatically extended
if it didn't cover at least two raw samples. This was needed in order to guarantee
non-empty results from rate(m[d]) on short time ranges.
Now the lookbehind window isn't extended if it is set explicitly,
since it is expected that the user knows what he is doing.
The lookbehind window continues to be extended when needed if it isn't set explicitly.
For example, in the case of rate(m).
Updates https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/3483
Previously empty series (e.g. series with all NaN samples) were passed to aggregate functions.
Such series must be ingored by all the aggregate functions.
So it is better from consistency PoV filtering out empty series before applying aggregate functions.
* app/vmselect: ignore empty series for `limit_offset`
VictoriaMetrics doesn't return empty series (with all NaN values) to
the user. But such series are filtered after transform functions.
It means `limit_offset` will account for empty series as well.
For example, let's consider following data set:
```
time series:
foo{label="1"} NaN, NaN, NaN, NaN // empty series
foo{label="2"} 1, 2, 3, 4
foo{label="3"} 4, 3, 2, 1
```
When user requests all series for metric `foo` the empty series
will be filtered out:
```
/query=foo:
foo{label="v2"} 1, 2, 3, 4
foo{label="v3"} 4, 3, 2, 1
```
But `limit_offset(1, 1, foo)` is applied to original series, not filtered yet.
So it will return `foo{label="v2"}` (skips the first in list)
```
/query=limit_offset(1, 1, foo):
foo{label="v2"} 1, 2, 3, 4
```
Expected result would be to apply `limit_offset` to already filtered list,
so in result we receive `foo{label="v3"}`:
```
/query=limit_offset(1, 1, foo):
foo{label="v3"} 4, 3, 2, 1
```
The change does exactly that - filters empty series before applying `limit_offset`.
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
* app/vmselect: ignore empty series for `limit_offset`
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
The workaround was introduced to fix https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/962.
However, it didn't prove itself useful. Instead, it is recommended using `increase_pure` function.
Removing the workaround makes VM to produce accurate results when calculating
`delta` or `increase` functions over slow-changing counters with vary intervals
between data points.
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
