There is a bug here where if you have a single bucket like:
foo{vmrange="4.084e+02...4.642e+02"} 2 123
The expected output is three le encoded buckets like:
foo{le="4.084e+02"} 0 123
foo{le="4.642e+02"} 2 123
foo{le="+Inf"} 2 123
This correctly encodes the start and end of the vmrange.
If however, the input contains the previous bucket, and that bucket is
empty then you only get the end le and +Inf out currently, i.e:
foo{vmrange="7.743e+05...8.799e+05"} 5 123
foo{vmrange="6.813e+05...7.743e+05"} 0 123
results in:
foo{le="8.799e+05"} 5 123
foo{le="+Inf"} 5 123
This causes issues when you go to compute a quantile because this means
that the assumed lower bound of the buckets is 0 and this we interpolate
between 0->end rather than the vmrange start->end as expected.
- Expose stats.seriesFetched at `/api/v1/query_range` responses too
for the sake of consistency.
- Initialize QueryStats when it is needed and pass it to EvalConfig then.
This guarantees that the QueryStats is properly collected when the query
contains some subqueries.
The change adds a new field `seriesFetched` to EvalConfig object.
Since EvalConfig object can be copied inside `Exec`,
`seriesFetched` is a pointer which can be updated by all copied
objects.
The reason for having stats is that other components, like vmalert,
could benefit from this information.
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
Co-authored-by: Aliaksandr Valialkin <valyala@victoriametrics.com>
using `runtime.Gosched` requires acquiring global lock to check if there are any other goroutines to perform tasks. with the latest versions of runtime it can pause running goroutines automatically without requiring to call `Gosched` directly.
Updates #3966
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
- Allocate and initialize seriesByWorkerID slice in a single go instead
of initializing every item in the list separately.
This should reduce CPU usage a bit.
- Properly set anti-false sharing padding at timeseriesWithPadding structure
- Document the change at docs/CHANGELOG.md
Updates https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/3966
* vmselect/promql: refactor `evalRollupNoIncrementalAggregate` to use lock-less approach for parallel workers computation
Locking there is causing issues when running on highly multi-core system as it introduces lock contention during results merge.
New implementation uses lock less approach to store results per workerID and merges final result in the end, this is expected to significantly reduce lock contention and CPU usage for systems with high number of cores.
Related: #3966
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
* vmselect/promql: add pooling for `timeseriesWithPadding` to reduce allocations
Related: #3966
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
* vmselect/promql: refactor `evalRollupFuncWithSubquery` to avoid using locks
Uses same approach as `evalRollupNoIncrementalAggregate` to remove locking between workers and reduce lock contention.
Related: #3966
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Zakhar Bessarab <z.bessarab@victoriametrics.com>
This opens the possibility to remove tssLock from evalRollupFuncWithSubquery()
in the follow-up commit from @zekker6 in order to speed up the code
for systems with many CPU cores.
Updates https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/3966
Call runtime.Gosched() only when there is a work to steal from other workers.
Simplify the timeseriesWorker() and unpackWroker() code a bit by inlining stealTimeseriesWork() and stealUnpackWork().
This should reduce CPU usage when processing queries on systems with big number of CPU cores.
Updates https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/3966
* vmselect/promql: check for deadline in `count_values` fn
`count_values` could be very slow during the data processing.
Checking for deadline between iterations supposed to reduce
probability of exceeding `search.maxQueryDuration`.
The change also adds a new trace record, which captures the time
spent in aggregation function. Before that, the trace for aggr funcs
could be confusing since it doesn't account for all the places where
time was spent.
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
* wip
---------
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
Co-authored-by: Aliaksandr Valialkin <valyala@victoriametrics.com>
