github-mirrors/HeatPumpController
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openhp/HeatPumpController.git synced 2024-11-18 12:33:59 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Update README.md

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
openhp 2021-03-24 16:55:12 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent a605bee155
commit 71334109ad
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md
View file

@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ Overall, your system with sensors positions will look like at drawing below. Re
<img src="./m_HeatPump_scheme2.png" width="500"><br><br> <img src="./m_HeatPump_scheme2.png" width="500"><br><br>
About water(glycol)<->refrigerant heat exchangers. You can use plate heat exchangers. Pros: best efficiency. Cons: costs money.<br> About water(glycol)<->refrigerant heat exchangers. You can use plate heat exchangers. Pros: best efficiency. Cons: costs money.<br>
<img src="./m_plate_heat_exchangers.jpg" width="500"><br><br> <img src="./m_plate_heat_exchangers.jpg" width="500"><br><br>
And oxygen brazing with (20%+)silver+copper solder required here: And oxygen brazing with (20%+)silver+copper solder required here:<br>
<img src="./m_plate_echangers_oxygen_brazing.jpg" width="500"><br><br> <img src="./m_plate_echangers_oxygen_brazing.jpg" width="500"><br><br>
You can build your own "tube-in-tube" heat exchangers. It's not hard. Cheaper. The heat exchange efficiency is worse. Very easy soldering.<br> You can build your own "tube-in-tube" heat exchangers. It's not hard. Cheaper. The heat exchange efficiency is worse. Very easy soldering.<br>
<img src="./m_tube-in-tube_diy1.jpg" width="400"> <img src="./m_tube-in-tube_diy2.jpg" width="400"><br><br> <img src="./m_tube-in-tube_diy1.jpg" width="400"> <img src="./m_tube-in-tube_diy2.jpg" width="400"><br><br>