mirror of
https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics.git
synced 2024-11-21 14:44:00 +00:00
23f8ab6f81
Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
105 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
105 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
weight: 400
|
|
title: Contributing
|
|
menu:
|
|
docs:
|
|
identifier: vm-contributing
|
|
parent: victoriametrics
|
|
weight: 400
|
|
aliases:
|
|
- /CONTRIBUTING.html
|
|
---
|
|
If you like VictoriaMetrics and want to contribute, then it would be great:
|
|
|
|
- Joining VictoriaMetrics community Slack ([Slack inviter](https://slack.victoriametrics.com/) and [Slack channel](https://victoriametrics.slack.com/))
|
|
and helping other community members there.
|
|
- Filing issues, feature requests and questions [at VictoriaMetrics GitHub](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues).
|
|
- Improving [VictoriaMetrics docs](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/). See how to update docs [here](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/#documentation).
|
|
- Spreading the word about VictoriaMetrics via various channels:
|
|
- conference talks
|
|
- blogposts, articles and [case studies](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/blob/master/docs/CaseStudies.md)
|
|
- comments at Hacker News, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Facebook, etc.
|
|
- experience sharing with colleagues.
|
|
- Convincing your management to sign [Enterprise contract](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/enterprise/) with VictoriaMetrics.
|
|
|
|
## Issues
|
|
|
|
When making a new issue, make sure to create no duplicates. Use GitHub search to find whether similar issues exist already.
|
|
The new issue should be written in English and contain concise description of the problem and environment where it exists.
|
|
We'd very much prefer to have a specific use-case included in the description, since it could have workaround or alternative solutions.
|
|
|
|
When looking for an issue to contribute, always prefer working on [bugs](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Abug)
|
|
instead of [enhancements](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aenhancement).
|
|
Helping other people with their [questions](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aquestion) is also a contribution.
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to contribute to [documentation](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/tree/master/docs) please
|
|
read the [guideline](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/#documentation).
|
|
|
|
### Labels
|
|
|
|
We use [labels](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/using-labels-and-milestones-to-track-work/managing-labels)
|
|
to categorize GitHub issues. We have the following labels:
|
|
1. A component label: vmalert, vmagent, etc. Add this label to the issue if it is related to a specific component.
|
|
1. An issue type: `bug`, `enhancement`, `question`.
|
|
1. `enterprize`, assigned to issues related to ENT features
|
|
1. `need more info`, assigned to issues which require elaboration from the issue creator.
|
|
For example, if we weren't able to reproduce the reported bug based on the ticket description then we ask additional
|
|
questions which could help to reproduce the issue and add `need more info` label. This label helps other maintainers
|
|
to understand that this issue wasn't forgotten but waits for the feedback from user.
|
|
1. `waiting for release`, assigned to issues that required code changes and those changes were merged to upstream, but not released yet.
|
|
Once a release is made, maintainers go through all labeled issues, leave a comment about the new release, remove the label, and close the issue.
|
|
1. `vmui`, assigned to issues related to https://docs.victoriametrics.com/#vmui or https://docs.victoriametrics.com/victorialogs/querying/#web-ui
|
|
|
|
## Pull request checklist
|
|
|
|
Implementing a bugfix or enhancement requires sending a pull request to the [corresponding repository](https://github.com/orgs/VictoriaMetrics/repositories).
|
|
|
|
A pull request should contain the following attributes:
|
|
1. Don't use `master` branch for making PRs, as it makes it impossible for reviewers to modify the change.
|
|
1. All commits need to be [signed](https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/signing-commits).
|
|
1. A clear and concise description of what was done and for what purpose.
|
|
1. A link to the issue related to this change, if any.
|
|
1. Tests proving that the change is effective. See [this style guide](https://itnext.io/f-tests-as-a-replacement-for-table-driven-tests-in-go-8814a8b19e9e) for tests.
|
|
To run tests and code checks locally execute commands `make tests-full` and `make check-all`.
|
|
1. Try to not extend the scope of the pull requests outside the issue, do not make unrelated changes.
|
|
1. Documentation update, if needed. For example, adding a new flag or changing behavior of existing flags or features
|
|
requires reflecting these changes in the documentation.
|
|
1. A line in the [changelog](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/changelog/#tip) mentioning the change and related issue in a way
|
|
that would be clear to other readers even if they don't have the full context.
|
|
1. Reviewers who you think have the best expertise on the matter.
|
|
|
|
See good example of pull request [here](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/pull/6487).
|
|
|
|
To merge the PR it should be approved by at least one reviewer, all CI checks should be green.
|
|
|
|
Once the PR is merged, check if related issues are still opened (GitHub may close it on PR merge).
|
|
The issue should be closed only when the change gets included into an actual release.
|
|
|
|
Label `waiting for release` is added to issues related to the merged PR. It makes easier for the person who makes the release
|
|
to track the related tickets and update them once release is published.
|
|
|
|
## KISS principle
|
|
|
|
We are open to third-party pull requests provided they follow [KISS design principle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle).
|
|
|
|
- Prefer simple code and architecture.
|
|
- Avoid complex abstractions.
|
|
- Avoid magic code and fancy algorithms.
|
|
- Apply optimizations, which make the code harder to understand, only if [profiling](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/#profiling)
|
|
shows significant improvements in performance and scalability or significant reduction in RAM usage.
|
|
Profiling must be performed on [Go benchmarks](https://pkg.go.dev/testing#hdr-Benchmarks) and on production workload.
|
|
- Avoid [big external dependencies](https://medium.com/@valyala/stripping-dependency-bloat-in-victoriametrics-docker-image-983fb5912b0d).
|
|
- Minimize the number of moving parts in the distributed system.
|
|
- Avoid automated decisions, which may hurt cluster availability, consistency, performance or debuggability.
|
|
|
|
Adhering `KISS` principle simplifies the resulting code and architecture, so it can be reviewed, understood and debugged by wider audience.
|
|
|
|
Due to `KISS`, [cluster version of VictoriaMetrics](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/cluster-victoriametrics/) has no the following "features" popular in distributed computing world:
|
|
|
|
- Fragile gossip protocols. See [failed attempt in Thanos](https://github.com/improbable-eng/thanos/blob/030bc345c12c446962225221795f4973848caab5/docs/proposals/completed/201809_gossip-removal.md).
|
|
- Hard-to-understand-and-implement-properly [Paxos protocols](https://www.quora.com/In-distributed-systems-what-is-a-simple-explanation-of-the-Paxos-algorithm).
|
|
- Complex replication schemes, which may go nuts in unforeseen edge cases. See [replication docs](https://docs.victoriametrics.com/cluster-victoriametrics/#replication-and-data-safety) for details.
|
|
- Automatic data reshuffling between storage nodes, which may hurt cluster performance and availability.
|
|
- Automatic cluster resizing, which may cost you a lot of money if improperly configured.
|
|
- Automatic discovering and addition of new nodes in the cluster, which may mix data between dev and prod clusters :)
|
|
- Automatic leader election, which may result in split brain disaster on network errors.
|